Explore the dark side of Khonsu: a sci-fi detective story

A city-sized generation ship tearing through the void of space, seeking planets for humanity to colonise. But onboard, life goes on, as it has for a couple of millennia. And life on the vast craft known as Khonsu is far from perfect. While the authorities do their best, the dark underbelly of Khonsu’s society churns away.

Such a place needs a dark hero. Investigative consultant Grim (don’t call him a detective‌—‌he doesn’t like it) isn’t a hero, but he’s the closest Khonsu’s got.

Banner image for Grim Khonsu, showing a noir detective in hat and coat on one side, and a space-ship heading towards a planet on the other

Grim Khonsu is a new serialised story, a chapter appearing each week. If you like your sci-fi soaked in noir, or if you like your detectives pulled between humans and technology, then check out Grim Khonsu. You can read the first chapter at twiain.substack.com/p/chapter-1.

And if you want subsequent chapters delivered straight into your inbox for free, sign up for my Substack at twiain.substack.com/.

Routine is good. Until it isn’t.

I’ve been in a rut recently. Yes, I’ve been struggling with this space-opera project, but that’s only part of it. I’ve lacked motivation. I’ve been far too easily distracted. While I’ve made progress with both the main Unity book and the first Chronicles of Seraph story, that progress has felt far too slow.

I used to be more productive. Back when I grew serious about writing, I was able to release about three books a year. But since releasing the final ShadowTech book last year, I haven’t put out any new fiction. I’ve had the Tales of Dominions Kickstarter, but that was a collection of previously written stories.

I don’t feel good about this. I’m letting my readers down. I’m letting myself down.

So, why the lack of motivation? In large part, this is down to the day-job. It’s been growing increasingly demoralising over the last few years (things started going downhill in 2020, and there’s been no sign of an improvement). While I try to compartmentalise things‌—‌that’s work, so it shouldn’t affect my writing or my life outside work‌—‌everything’s connected.

But things are about to change. I now have a new job, starting next week. It’s longer hours‌—‌but back when I produced three books a year I was working similar hours. Maybe the lethargy has been compounded by too much free time, too many opportunities for distraction. So I’m going into this new job with a more focused mind-set. When I open my laptop for writing, that’s what I’ll do. I’m also investigating ways I can use my phone more effectively, so I can make better use of breaks at work and odd moments when I’m not at the laptop. Yes, I’ll still get distracted, but if I go in with a more positive attitude, and if I’m conscious of possible distractions, I’ll be in a better position to head them off.

Of course, there’s going to be a period of adjustment. I’ll be working different shifts, so I’ll have to let my body grow accustomed to a new routine. And this new job gives me free weekends, so more opportunities for important family time.


With one change, it’s a good time to introduce another. As I mentioned before, I haven’t been as productive as I’d like. I’m spending more time editing and less time writing (first-drafting)‌—‌and while I enjoy editing it’s that earlier stage that I love.

So I need to produce more stories. And I need to get back to first-draft writing.

I have a plan.

I’m going to write a serial.


Okay, hold on a moment. I’m struggling to get through those space-opera books, and I’m about to start a new job that will leave me with less free time‌—‌and I’m going to add another project?

It isn’t as stupid as it sounds. This serial is connected to the whole Unity universe. The story will focus on one of the main characters from the central Unity story. Writing this serial will help me understand both that character and their setting.

And I’ll be releasing a chapter each week, somewhere between one and two thousand words (so about fifteen minutes reading time?). I can write that many words in an hour. Another couple of hours for editing, and things don’t look too unrealistic.

Oh, and it’s called Grim Khonsu. It’s a blend of sci-fi and detective noir. I’ve wanted to produce something in this vein for a while now, writing a first draft of a novel a few years ago. Some of the ideas from that have ended up in the initial work on Unity, and others I’m using in this serial.


Of course, this will involve a different way of working. I’m a plotter. I like to know where my stories are going before I start writing. But with a serial, I’ll be going one chapter at a time. Okay, I’ll have a few in the bag, and I have ideas about the direction of the story, along with the larger overview. But I don’t know the details yet. I’ll only discover them as I write.

Will this work? I don’t know. I’d like to think I’m sufficiently confident in my writing to pull it off, but I might write myself into all kinds of corners. And I’m committing myself to a new chapter each week. What if I’m ill? What if the story grows too cumbersome and I need to have a major rethink?

Problems to deal with if and when they arise. This is an experiment. It will allow me to get back to the thrill of first-drafting. It will allow me to put more fiction out there, giving readers something they’ll (hopefully) enjoy. And, because of its connection with my grand space-opera concept, it will enrich that story too.

It could all go horribly wrong, of course. And if it does, I’ll treat it as a learning experience.

But I’m quietly confident. Things are changing. I’ll be developing new routines, ones that should make me more productive, less prone to lethargy and distraction.

And I’m doing this in public. That’s scary. But it gives me accountability. I don’t like going back on my word, so now that I’ve committed to this, I have to keep it up. You’ll hold me to that, right? And as this story takes shape, as I add a new chapter each week, I’d appreciate any kind of feedback.

A change. An opportunity to start a new experiment. I hope you’ll come along for the ride.

More to follow…


This post is the latest in a series I’m running on Substack, chronicling my work on this space-opera project. If you’d like to read these posts as they appear, please consider subscribing for free.

Why climb? Why write?

Over the last few years, as I’ve worked on improving both my climbing and my writing, I’ve seen many similarities between these activities. I’ve detailed my thoughts on this over the last few posts, but here’s a quick recap.

  • Progress isn’t linear. There are jumps alternating with plateaus of consolidation, dotted with the occasional dip. But over time, progress happens.
  • Sometimes things don’t work out, for reasons we can’t (yet) understand. Accept this and carry on.
  • Deliberate, focused practice is important.
  • Alongside deliberate practice there should be times of pushing forward and trying things beyond our current abilities.
  • Everyone is different. What works for me won’t necessarily work for you. While learning from others is important, we must each find our own way.
  • The problem might not be the problem. When stuck, the solution might lay be uncovered in what came before.
  • Knowing isn’t the same as doing (which is why practice and perseverance are so important)
  • Muscle memory is useful, but remember that practice makes permanent, not necessarily perfect.

To bring this short series to a close, I want to consider a question. Why? Why do I climb, and why do I write?

The knee-jerk response is to say that I enjoy both activities. Fair enough, but I enjoy listening to music, and I don’t put in anywhere near the same effort in this as I do in climbing and writing.

So let’s go deeper. I became serious about my writing ten years ago. Why then? What caused this mind-shift?

At that time, I was struggling at work. I won’t go into details, but I felt like I had no control over the situation, and no clear way forward.

This was when I started writing more regularly. I had no big plan. I started from the kernel of an idea, and wrote to see what would happen.

My writing was something I could control. True, I didn’t know where the story was going. But there wasn’t anyone else dictating what happened. Ultimately, I was the one who decided.

Some years later I had a short novella included in an anthology called The Power Of Words, and I realised that this power lies not only in the words themselves but also in bringing them forth. Writing gave me something I lacked in my job. It gave me a voice, even if this writing was, at that point, only for myself.

I’d written before, but it reached somewhere deeper in me now. I continued, eventually finishing and then independently publishing novels.

And realised that writing was only a part of what being a writer was all about. Now that I had these books I needed to market them.

Okay, I didn’t need to. I could have put them up on Amazon and left everything to chance. But I thought it would be good to get something back from them‌—‌readers, and also money. At least enough to pay for the production.

So I set about learning marketing. I learnt about newsletters and websites, about reader magnets. I learnt about advertising and reader funnels, social media and reader tropes. And a whole lot more. I tried different tactics to help readers find and buy my books.

And while I have sold a few copies, and have had some positive reviews and ratings, none of my books have yet earned out. So far, this writing and publishing thing has cost more than it’s brought in.

Why? I don’t know. I try things. I follow what others have done. I try to analyse where things are failing.

And one thing I’ve come to realise is that there are no guarantees. I could do exactly the same as some successful writer, and I’d have wildly different results.

Because it’s not something I can control. Yes, I can tweak ads, or focus on targeting. Yes, I can write posts and newsletters. But when it comes to potential readers connecting with the ads, posts or newsletters, there is too much outside my control. There are a million other distractions. And if a potential reader does pay attention, are they in the frame of mind to buy, or to download a free book? If they download a book, will it become just another file, pushed down the TBR list in favour of a new, more exciting-sounding title?

I can control my input into marketing, but I can’t control what happens after that. I’m at the whims of reader attention, of various store and social media site algorithms.

Which could explain why I grew more serious about climbing over the last few years. With a vague despondency over the lack of marketing success, I needed a feeling of control. While the writing served this to a point, it was always tinged with the marketing side of things.

In most sports, you compete against others, either individually or as part of a team. There is a winner, and by default there are losers (those who didn’t win). But climbing is different. Yes, there are climbing competitions (even at the level I climb), but the competition is far more internal.

I think I’ve mentioned the friendly, co-operative atmosphere I’ve found at climbing walls. Whatever level you climb at, there will be someone to offer advice and encouragement. As a regular at the walls I climb at, I’m often there with other regulars, and we often work on a problem together. We’ll bounce ideas around, each trying something slightly different.

Usually, someone will reach the top first. But that doesn’t mean they’ve ‘won’, because the rest of us might reach the top using a slightly different set of moves. And even if you don’t reach the top, you’ve made progress.

And that progress isn’t down to others. Okay, there’s the advice. And the encouragement. But you take that in, and you let that feed into your efforts. Then, when the set of moves works out and you reach the top, you can justifiably say that you’ve done it.

And if you don’t? It’s not a case of someone else beating you to it, or someone else interfering (unless they do, in which case they’ll get thrown out). No, it’s simply that you’re not quite ready to solve that particular problem. Keep working at it, and maybe you will.

It comes back to control. Top out or not, it’s down to me. My climbing is under my control.


I’ve come to realise that having at least one activity like this‌—‌something controllable‌—‌is vitally important. We exist in societies, where we have to fit in with others. Our actions are so often dictated or influenced by others, even people we don’t know. We can control how we respond to situations (to an extent), but we can’t control those situations. So having some time each week when we are autonomous can give a respite from this.

It’s what I get from both writing (storytelling) and climbing. I get to be in control of things for a while. Yes, I get enjoyment from both activities (and there’s physical wellbeing connected with climbing, barring any injuries), but they both help remind me that effort can bring rewards. It might not feel like that at times‌—‌for instance, when another set of ads falls flat. But that’s because I haven’t found the right approach yet. It’s like the ‘everyone climbs differently’ thing‌—‌what works for one person won’t necessarily work for me.

So I have to keep on. To climb higher grades I need to work on technique and push myself. To write better books I need to work on craft. To sell more books I need to persevere with marketing, taking in more advice and lessons and trying different approaches until I find what works for me.

And maybe that is another lesson from climbing I can bring to writing. Everything else can be seen as tactics, or ways to improve, but behind it all is perseverance.

The final, and most important, lesson‌—‌don’t give up.


And that’s it for what climbing has taught me about writing. This series originally appeared on my free Substack‌—‌click here to subscribe. If you’re interested in the previous posts, after a short introduction I go into details on progress, my thoughts on practice, how individuality plays a role, and how knowing and doing are not the same.

Knowing and doing are not the same

This is the fifth of a short series on lessons learnt from climbing and how they relate to writing. Click on these links for the introduction, a look at progress, my thoughts on practice, and how individuality plays a role.


I sometimes wonder if my body and mind are operating in totally different spheres. Too often, I understand how to do something, and know in my mind exactly what I need to do, but my body simply doesn’t get the message.

This always leads to frustration when trying to master new techniques. I’ve mentioned heel-hooks before, that I could understand how to do the technique, but couldn’t convince my body to put this into practice. And I’ve mentioned learning to roll a kayak in a previous post. Again, I knew what I needed to do, but I couldn’t do it.

There’s a vast expanse between knowing and doing. Some of this is down to physical limitations. I know I need to put my weight over a high foot position, but I don’t have the flexibility to place my foot properly in the first place, and don’t have the movement in my hips to get over the placement. Or I understand how to use opposing pulls to keep myself on the wall, but don’t have the strength to support my weight properly.

There is a way to overcome these limitations, and that’s training. I can improve my flexibility through targeted stretching. I can improve strength through exercise. Yes, there are limits (I’m not getting any younger, and there are physical laws to contend with), but I can push closer to those limits.

This training is also mental. It sometimes feels like there are barriers to break down, barriers that are keeping me from performing actions I know I can do. It’s too easy to fall back into old habits, despite telling myself I need to stop. As I’ve said before, climbing is as much a mental activity as it is physical.

There are parallels in writing. I know I use certain words too much, but they still spew onto the page. I know I don’t need to spell out what my characters are feeling (because it’s better to show the effect of their emotions), but when I come to edit I spend far too long removing these redundancies.

But there are ways through. I did learn to roll a kayak. I’m confident with heel-hooks now. And while those writing problems still occur, I’m quicker to spot them when editing.

So, how did I bridge this gap between knowing and doing?

Practice. Focused practice alongside repetition.

This builds muscle memory, and I see examples of this pretty much every time I have a good session at the climbing wall.

If I’m on a hard route, I won’t reach the top on my first attempt. I might initially struggle to get off the ground. But I persevere. I try different moves, and eventually find what works for me. Then the next move stumps me for a while, and I go through the same trial-and-error routine until I find the technique that suits my way of climbing. And so on, move by move. After a few weeks I might even reach the top.

But here’s the thing‌—‌those bottom moves get easier. The holds don’t change, but I know what to do, and my body has adapted to this. Often, on a particularly tricky climb, by the time I’m working on upper moves I can speed over the lower ones. Through repetition my body has learnt exactly what to do, and I climb efficiently. Where those lower moves used to drain my energy, now I can breeze through them, leaving me with sufficient energy to tackle the higher moves.

Muscle memory. It works.

But there can be an issue here.

I’m sure you’ve heard the phrase ‘practice makes perfect’. It’s a lie. Practice makes permanent, not perfect. Practice a wrong move over and over, and it becomes ingrained (permanent). And maybe it works in the short term. But the technique is off, and the now muscle-memory-locked move can cause issues elsewhere. And to correct this less-than-perfect technique will require far more work than developing the correct technique in the first place. Correcting means unlearning then relearning.

Let’s give an example from writing. Like many writers, I use a keyboard. I did write my first ever attempt at a novel long-hand, but my physical writing too readily becomes a scrawl I struggle to read. I’ve tried dictation, but I think in words rather than sounds. I don’t want to have loads of physical paper around the place. I appreciate how easy it is to manipulate text files‌—‌copying them to ensure I have back-ups, as well as the advantages text files bring in editing.

Being the age I am, my schoolwork was all written by hand. I can’t recall ever seeing a computer at school. I had a Sinclair Spectrum at home‌—‌connect it to the TV, use a tape deck to load and save programs, and work with a massive 48K of memory! Oh, and type on squishy, small keys. Fast typing wasn’t a thing on the Spectrum.

When I did start using ‘proper’ computers, I didn’t have any kind of keyboard training. I found my way around the keys, progressing from a two-finger ‘look and stab’ approach, slowly using more fingers. Then, when I became serious about writing, I realised I needed to be more efficient.

I got some typing tutor software. I made a concerted effort to use the correct finger for each key.

But I’d already developed other habits. I could type ‘correctly’ if I concentrated, but it was usually slower than if I fell into a kind of mish-mash of self-taught and ‘proper’ typing.

I knew that ‘proper’ typing, if I could master it, would improve my typing speed. I also knew it would take a lot of work. Was it worth the effort?

Maybe. But how fast did I need to type? Yes, sometimes when writing the words flow. But often, I’ll tear through a sentence or two, then need to think about what comes next. Writing is as much about thinking as it is about getting words on the page. And my hybrid style was fast enough for my way of writing. Forcing myself to touch-type all the time would slow me down in the short term, and while it might make me faster over short bursts eventually, I didn’t think it would improve my overall writing speed.

So I’ve muscle-memoried my way into somewhere between permanent and perfect. It’s good enough for me. It’s fast enough to get my ideas out without too much delay. It’s full of quirks (I only tend to use the ‘shift’ key with the little finger on my left hand, very rarely with my right), but I do use all my fingers, and I use those bumps on the ‘f’ and ‘j’ keys to orientate my hands. I can type without looking at the keyboard, and fairly often without looking at the screen either.

It works for me.


Which, now I think about it, comes back to the individuality thing I mentioned last time. Everyone is different. There is no ‘right’ way of doing something.

But it’s worth trying to do things ‘correctly’. While I’ve accepted my particular take on typing, I’m still working on those too-common words. I’m still absorbing all I can on the craft of writing, focusing on new techniques and ideas. Slowly, I’m translating that knowledge into practice, and I know that my first drafts now are far superior to the drafts I started with on earlier books. Similarly, in climbing, I’ve incorporated techniques I’ve struggled with, and this combined with improvements in my ability to read routes means I’m able to flash problems that would have stumped me a couple of years ago.

It’s a slow process, though. And I’m fine with that. The improvements week-on-week might be so small I can barely see them (and I might have weeks when, for whatever reasons, I ‘slip back’), but on a longer time-frame I’m making progress. I’m taking in knowledge, and with focused practice I’m putting that knowledge into effect.


This brings us to the end of these lessons from climbing and how they relate to writing. Next time, I’ll sum up and take a quick look at why‌—‌why I climb, and why I write.


This post is the latest in a series I’m running on Substack. If you’d like to read these posts as they appear, please consider subscribing for free.

Every climber is different, every writer is different

This is the third of a short series on lessons learnt from climbing and how they relate to writing. Click on these links for the introduction, a look at progress, and my thoughts on practice.


Routes in climbing walls aren’t random. Setters position each hold precisely, leading to a sequence of moves that provide a satisfying climb.

A part of the challenge of climbing is ‘reading the route’. If you’ve watched climbing competitions you’ll have seen the climbers studying the wall, reaching up and twisting their body in preparation. They’ll look at holds from different angles, planning the best grip and approach. Reading the route correctly makes for an easier climb, reducing the chance of unwanted surprises.

So, routes are set a particular way. Climbers plan their moves before leaving the mat. Yet no two climbers will reach the top in exactly the same way.

Because everyone is different.

This might seem obvious, but there are hidden subtleties. Yes, height (or arm-span) plays a part. As does flexibility‌—‌I struggle to get my body into positions that others fold into with no trouble. Some climbers have stronger upper bodies, others have stronger cores.

And these obvious differences, over time, result in each climber developing in different ways. Because I can hang from holds quite comfortably I naturally dangle around and swing my legs up high, often climbing past problems with my body more horizontal than vertical. This has led to me using lots of side-pulls, which has altered how I approach problems on vertical walls or slabs.

I get up the climb in one way, and someone else will climb it a different way. Even though a route is set to give a particular sequence of moves, there are always alternatives.

Which is why climbing with others is so helpful. Watching others, and talking with them, gives more ideas and opens up more possibilities. I might not use their ideas, but I can adapt them.

A couple of examples: A recent problem I attempted started with a very high right foot. I could get the foot up there, but couldn’t transfer my weight to it. So I swapped, starting with my left foot. It worked‌—‌for me. And it required a strange cross-legged move afterwards. I haven’t seen anyone else do it this way, but it suited my style (or maybe that should be ‘eccentricities’?)

A different climb: I could see how it was set, and the obvious hand-holds didn’t look great. But I saw an alternative‌—‌one that seemed to surprise the staff at the wall. My way meant hanging low from the start hold and using a high heel, bringing my body horizontal. From here I could twist and reach up for the next hold, avoiding those horrible sloping ones I didn’t like the look of. As with the high foot problem, it wasn’t the way the route was set, but it was the most comfortable and efficient way for me to climb it.

There is never one way to solve a problem. Every climber has to find their own way to reach the top.

And it’s the same in writing.

One question often asked of a writer is “Are you a plotter or a pantser”‌—‌do you plan your stories in advance, or discover the story as you write? In reality, these are ends of a spectrum, and writers sit in different positions along that continuum. Some work from detailed outlines that can be thousands of words long, others write from bullet-points for each chapter. Some get with a gem of an idea, start writing, then stop and plan the rest of the story when they reach the half-way point. Others write whatever comes to mind each session until they reach the end.

I try to plan, but as I write things always change. I used to find this frustrating, but now I accept that it’s simply how I function. I like to know where I’m going, but I accept that detours might be needed‌—‌and will probably make for a far better journey.

Then there is voice. Not character voice, but writer voice. Someone like Stephen King has a very particular voice in his writing‌—‌read a paragraph or two, and you’re in no doubt that you’re reading a King novel. Voices can be imitated, but it’s hard to fully clone another writer’s voice. And why bother? It’s better to develop a voice of your own.

Why? Because it’s yours. The voice is a part of what makes your books unique. It’s often been said that if you give a hundred writers the same story outline, you’ll get a hundred very different stories, and a big part of this is down to voice. Even following the same story beats, voice will lead to different stories.

This takes time. After around twenty books I’m starting to understand my voice‌—‌and as I learn more about the craft of writing it’s changing. Or maybe I should say it’s refining. The voice is becoming more polished.

I’m never going to write beautiful, flowery prose‌—‌at least, not comfortably. That’s not part of my voice. I’m more likely to use sentence fragments. I also use a lot of em-dashes (those things that are supposedly a sign of AI writing).

Beyond the writing, every writer approaches marketing differently too.

This is something of a pain-point for me. I’ve tried all kinds of things‌—‌content marketing, Amazon ads, Facebook ads, BookBub ads. I use reader magnets and promo sites. I’ve attempted social media, and I’ve come to the conclusion that I’m even more of an introvert online than I am in the real world. I work best with words, so video-based social media simply doesn’t appeal to me, and I struggle to get enthused over something like TikTok. But using words has its own problem‌—‌I plan what I want to say. On any social media with fast back-and-forth (like Twitter/X), by the time I’ve wrangled my thoughts into something cohesive, the moment has passed.

So social media isn’t going to be a bedrock of my marketing. It is for others, though. Some have had their careers explode through TikTok. Others have mastered ads. Some sell the majority of their books at conventions, or through their own on-line stores.

Everyone is different. Everyone has a way of working and a philosophy that aligns with a particular marketing strategy. I’ve yet to find my niche, but I have to believe it’s out there.

And, as with that tricky route where I watch multiple climbers succeed but can’t emulate their styles successfully, it’s going to take time. And effort. I’ll only find what works for me after discarding what doesn’t.

There are always problems to overcome.

And sometimes, the problem isn’t where I think it is.


In most well-set bouldering problems, there will be a particular move or sequence that is the crux‌—‌the hard part. It’s the point where most climbers will struggle. We’ll try different strategies for getting past the crux‌—‌twisting to the right instead of the left, using a dynamic move, or using a toe-hook.

This can work. But sometimes the problem lies not in the crux itself but in the approach. Imagine we work on the crux in isolation, and solve it when we use our right foot on a certain hold. But when we start from the ground, we end up with our left foot on this hold. So, to solve the crux in context, we need to reassess our approach.

This is true in writing as well. If a particular climax (of the story or the scene) doesn’t land, there’s a problem. Do we need to work on the writing at the climax itself, or is there something we’re missing earlier?

Imagine we have an apparently hopeless situation, but our hero saves the day with a particular piece of equipment. If this equipment appears from nowhere, the reader will feel cheated (and rightly so). So, we need to go back and mention this equipment earlier.

There’s a concept often called Chekov’s gun (guess which famous classic author it’s normally attributed to?) that says if a gun is on the mantelpiece in the first act, it should be used in the final act. In reverse, if a gun is used in the final act, it should be on display in the first act. So, to solve our problem of the amazing appearance of a particular piece of equipment, we have it appear earlier.

But what if the issue is in the emotional punch of the climax? As it stands, the punch falls short. This might be in the writing of the scene, or it might be a case of not building to the climax adequately. Maybe we need to have a similar scene earlier, but one where the hero fails. Or we need to add back-story that lets the reader know, in advance, why this climax hits the hero so hard.

Combining this with writer voice, is the climax failing because it doesn’t work in our style? Maybe we should let the scene rest for a while and work on our craft. Maybe we’re simply not ready to attempt that kind of climax, just as my toe-hook is not yet strong enough to get past problems that require this technique.

There is always a solution. It might be at the crux or climax. It might be in the lead-up. Or it might be a case of working on technique and skills before making another attempt.


This brings us to another aspect of progress in both climbing and writing‌—‌we only know what we know. I’ll look at that, and the differences between knowing and doing, next time.


This post is the latest in a series I’m running on Substack, chronicling my work on this new project. If you’d like to read these posts as they appear, please consider subscribing for free.

‘Tales of Dominions’ funded!

We did it! The Tales of Dominions Kickstarter reached its funding goal.

But if you missed out, I have you covered. I’ve set up late pledges, and I’ll leave them open for another day or so. Click here to see what it’s all about. But don’t hang around‌—‌when we hit the weekend, there will be no more late pledges, and no opportunity to get the special edition paperback or hard-cover of Tales of Dominions.

Click here to learn more.